EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Validation of Lund University Sexual Harassment Inventory (LUSHI)—A Proposed Instrument for Assessing Sexual Harassment among University Employees and Students

Per-Olof Östergren (), Catarina Canivet, Gisela Priebe and Anette Agardh
Additional contact information
Per-Olof Östergren: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
Catarina Canivet: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
Gisela Priebe: Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden
Anette Agardh: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 24, 1-13

Abstract: The objective was to investigate the validity and reliability of a new instrument assessing sexual harassment at a public university in Sweden. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions resulted in a 10-item instrument, the ‘Lund University Sexual Harassment Inventory’ (LUSHI). A survey was sent to all staff, including PhD students, and students, with a response rate of 33% ( n = 2736) and 32% ( n = 9667), respectively. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha statistics were applied. Having experienced one or more of 10 specific behaviors was defined as sexual harassment exposure and was reported by 17.1% of staff/PhD students and 21.1% of students. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors with Eigenvalues above 1, labeled ‘unwanted sexual attention of soliciting type’ and ‘unwanted sexual attention of non-soliciting type’. Rape/attempted rape fell outside of the two factors. The Cronbach’s alpha values of the original 10-item scale and of the two newly formed scales were 0.80, 0.80, and 0.66, respectively. The mentioned statistics were markedly similar among men, women, and non-binary individuals and between staff/PhD students and students. We conclude that the 10-item instrument could be used for assessing sexual harassment in university settings or any type of workplace.

Keywords: sexual harassment; occupational health; student health; gender and health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/17085/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/17085/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:17085-:d:1008269

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:17085-:d:1008269