Modeling and Validation of Fatigue and Recovery of Muscles for Manual Demolition Tasks

Cannan Yi, Fan Tang, Kai-Way Li, Hong Hu, Huali Zuo and Caijun Zhao
Additional contact information
Cannan Yi: School of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421102, China
Fan Tang: School of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421102, China
Kai-Way Li: Department of Industrial Management, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu 30012, Taiwan
Hong Hu: School of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421102, China
Huali Zuo: School of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421102, China
Caijun Zhao: School of Safety and Management Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang 421102, China

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 2, 1-15

Abstract: Manual demolition tasks are heavy, physically demanding tasks that could cause muscle fatigue accumulation and lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Fatigue and recovery models of muscles are essential in understanding the accumulation and the reduction in muscle fatigue for forceful exertion tasks. This study aims to explore the onset of muscle fatigue under different work/rest arrangements during manual demolition tasks and the offset of fatigue over time after the tasks were performed. An experiment, including a muscle fatigue test and a muscle fatigue recovery test, was performed. Seventeen male adults without experience in demolition hammer operation were recruited as human participants. Two demolition hammers (large and small) were adopted. The push force was either 20 or 40 N. The posture mimicked that of a demolition task on a wall. In the muscle fatigue test, the muscle strength ( MS ) before and after the demolition task, maximum endurance time (MET), and the Borg category-ratio-10 (CR-10) ratings of perceived exertion after the demolition task were measured. In the muscle fatigue recovery test, MS and CR-10 at times 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 min were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to explore the influence of push force and the weight of the tool on MS , MET, and CR-10. Both muscle fatigue models and muscle fatigue recovery models were established and validated. The results showed that push force affected MET significantly ( p < 0.05). The weight of the tool was significant ( p < 0.05) only on the CR-10 rating after the first pull. During the muscle fatigue recovery test, the MS increase and the CR-10 decrease were both significant ( p < 0.05) after one or more breaks. Models of MET and MS prediction were established to assess muscle fatigue recovery, respectively. The absolute (AD) and relative (RD) deviations of the MET model were 1.83 (±1.94) min and 34.80 (±31.48)%, respectively. The AD and RD of the MS model were 1.39 (±0.81) N and 1.9 (±1.2)%, respectively. These models are capable of predicting the progress and recovery of muscle fatigue, respectively, and may be adopted in work/rest arrangements for novice workers performing demolition tasks.

Keywords: manual demolition task; muscle fatigue; muscle fatigue recovery; prediction modeling; work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/930/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/930/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:930-:d:725112

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().