Experiences of Women Who Refuse Recall for Further Investigation of Abnormal Screening Mammography: A Qualitative Study

Wei-Ying Sung, Hui-Chuan Yang, I-Chen Liao, Yu-Ting Su, Fu-Husan Chen and Shu-Ling Chen
Additional contact information
Wei-Ying Sung: Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
Hui-Chuan Yang: Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
I-Chen Liao: Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
Yu-Ting Su: Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
Fu-Husan Chen: Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
Shu-Ling Chen: Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43304, Taiwan

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 3, 1-11

Abstract: Breast cancer has the highest incidence among all cancers for women in Taiwan. The current screening policy in Taiwan provides biennial mammogram tests for all women aged 45 to 69 years. A recommendation for further investigation is sent via post to women with a BI-RADS result of 0. The proportion of women who followed-up with a recall request for further investigation after an abnormal mammogram has been below 92.5% in recent years. Therefore, we aimed to explore the experiences of these women who refused recall for further investigation despite an abnormal mammogram. Purposive sampling was conducted on 13 women who refused recall for further examination of abnormal screening mammograms. Data collection included inductive, in-depth interviews or telephone interviews. A content analysis was applied. Three themes were identified: (1) negative screening experiences, (2) struggling with ’to go or not to go’, and (3) rationalizing without a follow-up examination. The first theme included three subthemes: (1) pain of examination, (2) the inconvenience of medical treatment; waiting, and (3) dissatisfaction with having to pay for further examination. The second major theme included three subthemes: (1) perceiving one’s susceptibility to breast cancer as very low, (2) questioning the accuracy of the results, and (3) procrastinating with a “head-in-the-sand” mentality. The third major theme included two subthemes: (1) fatalism and (2) paying attention to self-cultivation. In conclusion, the findings provide important information to healthcare providers involved in case management related to the actual living experiences of women with abnormal screening mammogram results and the additional education required to raise breast cancer awareness in the general public to achieve overall caring goals.

Keywords: breast cancer; mammography; screening; follow-up; qualitative study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1041/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1041/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1041-:d:727324

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().