Predicting Abusive Behaviours in Spanish Adolescents’ Relationships: Insights from the Reasoned Action Approach

Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez, María Ángeles Pastor-Mira, Sofía López-Roig, Lidia Pamies-Aubalat, Fermín Martínez-Zaragoza and Victoria A. Ferrer-Pérez
Additional contact information
Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez: Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03202 Elche, Spain
María Ángeles Pastor-Mira: Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03202 Elche, Spain
Sofía López-Roig: Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03202 Elche, Spain
Lidia Pamies-Aubalat: Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03202 Elche, Spain
Fermín Martínez-Zaragoza: Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernandez, 03202 Elche, Spain
Victoria A. Ferrer-Pérez: Faculty of Psychology, Balears Island University, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: (1) Background: Partner violence prevention programmes do not produce the expected behavioural changes. Accordingly, experts suggest applying evidence-based behavioural models to identify the determinants of abusive behaviours. In this research, we applied the reasoned action approach (RAA) to predict the performance (boys) and acceptance (girls) of abusive behaviours in adolescents. (2) Method: We designed a questionnaire based on the RAA and performed a cross-sectional study. We analysed the predictive capacity of the RAA constructs on intentions with the sample of single adolescents ( n = 1112). We replicated the analysis only with those who were in a relationship ( n = 587) and in addition analysed the predictive capacity of intention on future behaviour (3 months later). (3) Results: The hierarchical regression analysis performed with the sample of single adolescents showed that the model explained 56% and 47% of the variance of boys’ intentions to perform the controlling and devaluing behaviours, respectively; and 62% and 33% of girls’ intention to accept them. With those in a relationship, the model explained 60% and 53% of the variance of boys’ intentions to perform the controlling and devaluating behaviour, respectively, and 70% and 38% of girls’ intention to accept them. Intention exerted direct effects on boys’ performance of controlling and devaluing behaviours (31% and 34% of explained variance, respectively) and on girls’ acceptance (30% and 7%, respectively). (4) Conclusions: The RAA seems useful to identify the motivational determinants of abusive behaviours, regardless of adolescents´ relationship status, and for their prediction. Perceived social norms emerge as a relevant predictor on which to intervene to produce behavioural changes with both sexes.

Keywords: abusive behaviours; adolescence; dating violence; prevention; reasoned action approach; evidence-based model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1441/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1441/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1441-:d:735708

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().