EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Employees of Three Hospitals of a Secondary Care Hospital Network in Germany and an Associated Fire Brigade: Results of a Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveillance Study Over 1 Year

Anke Hildebrandt, Oktay Hökelekli, Lutz Uflacker, Henrik Rudolf, Michael Paulussen and Sören G. Gatermann
Additional contact information
Anke Hildebrandt: St. Vincenz Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine I, 45711 Datteln, Germany
Oktay Hökelekli: St. Vincenz Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine I, 45711 Datteln, Germany
Lutz Uflacker: St. Vincenz Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine I, 45711 Datteln, Germany
Henrik Rudolf: Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
Michael Paulussen: Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik, Witten/Herdecke University, 45711 Datteln, Germany
Sören G. Gatermann: National Reference Center for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 4, 1-15

Abstract: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are playing a vital role in the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This study investigated how infection spreads within three local hospitals and an associated fire brigade in Germany by testing employees for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies over one year. The three observational periods corresponded to the initial three pandemic waves: first wave: June–September 2020, second wave: October 2020–January 2021, and third wave: February–June 2021. We analysed 3285 serum samples of 1842 employees, which represents 65.7% of all employees. Altogether, 13.2% employees were seropositive: 194/1411 HCWs (13.7%) and 49/431 non-HCWs (11.4%) with a clear increase of seroprevalence from the first (1.1%) to the second (13.2%) and third (29.3%) pandemic wave. HCWs presumably had an additional occupational risk for infection in the second and third wave due to an increase of infection pressure with more COVID-19 patients treated, showing possible weak points in the recommended infection prevention strategy.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; COVID-19; antibodies; healthcare workers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2402/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2402/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2402-:d:753359

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2402-:d:753359