Couple Conflict and Intimate Partner Violence during the Early Lockdown of the Pandemic: The Good, the Bad, or Is It Just the Same in a North Carolina, Low-Resource Population?
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling,
Grace E. Schroeder,
Ryan A. Langhinrichsen-Rohling,
Annelise Mennicke,
Yu-Jay Harris,
Sharon Sullivan,
Glori Gray and
Robert J. Cramer
Additional contact information
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling: Department of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
Grace E. Schroeder: Department of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
Ryan A. Langhinrichsen-Rohling: Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Annelise Mennicke: School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
Yu-Jay Harris: Psychology for All, Charlotte, NC 28227, USA
Sharon Sullivan: Psychology for All, Charlotte, NC 28227, USA
Glori Gray: Psychology for All, Charlotte, NC 28227, USA
Robert J. Cramer: Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 5, 1-15
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced couples to navigate illness-related stressors and unique public health responses, including extended lockdowns. This study focused on under-resourced North Carolina residents ( n = 107) who self-reported changes in relationship conflict (Increased, Decreased, Stayed the Same) and intimate partner violence (IPV) during the pandemic. We expected high rates of increased conflict and IPV since the start of the pandemic. We then sought to determine the associations between dyadic changes in conflict and reports of IPV and pandemic-related experiences and responses. Participants completed a brief online survey assessing their demographics, COVID-19 exposure/stressors, and pandemic responses. As expected, reports of increased couple conflict were related to difficulties getting needed social support, loss of health insurance, more fear and worry, stress, pain, and greater use of alcohol and/or illicit drugs, related to the coronavirus. Participants reporting increased conflict were also more likely to be unemployed. Conversely, reports of decreased conflict were associated with being ill from the virus (48.9%), having health insurance, and working part time. Substantial amounts of IPV were reported (62.2% of the sample); however, increased conflict and IPV were unrelated. Those reporting No IPV were less likely to be receiving public assistance but more likely to have home responsibilities due to the virus. They also reported increased social interactions and less use of alcohol than those reporting IPV perpetration. Findings highlight key associations among pandemic experiences and responses, IPV, and couple functioning in an under-resourced sample. Efforts to facilitate coping, resilience, and tolerating uncertainty may facilitate cooperative and safe couple functioning throughout the pandemic.
Keywords: couple conflict; intimate partner violence; COVID-19; pandemic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2608/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2608/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2608-:d:757224
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().