Exploring Families’ Acceptance of Wearable Activity Trackers: A Mixed-Methods Study

Amy V. Creaser, Jennifer Hall, Silvia Costa, Daniel D. Bingham and Stacy A. Clemes
Additional contact information
Amy V. Creaser: School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Jennifer Hall: Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
Silvia Costa: School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Daniel D. Bingham: Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
Stacy A. Clemes: School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 6, 1-36

Abstract: Background: The family environment plays a crucial role in child physical activity (PA). Wearable activity trackers (wearables) show potential for increasing children’s PA; however, few studies have explored families’ acceptance of wearables. This study investigated the acceptability of using wearables in a family setting, aligning experiences with components of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theoretical Domains Framework. Methods: Twenty-four families, with children aged 5–9 years, took part in a 5-week study, where all members were provided with a Fitbit Alta HR for 4 weeks. Acceptability was measured using weekly surveys and pre-post-questionnaires. Nineteen families participated in a focus group. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using the Pillar Integration Process technique. Results: Pillars reflected (1) external variables impacting wearable use and PA and (2) wearable use, (3) ease of use, (4) usefulness for increasing PA and other health outcomes, (5) attitudes, and (6) intention to use a wearable, including future intervention suggestions. Conclusions: Families found the Fitbit easy to use and acceptable, but use varied, and perceived impact on PA were mixed, with external variables contributing towards this. This study provides insights into how wearables may be integrated into family-based PA interventions and highlights barriers and facilitators of family wearable use.

Keywords: Fitbit; pillar integration process; technology acceptance model; theoretical domains framework; feasibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3472/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3472/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3472-:d:771745

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().