How Do Older Adults Process Icons in Visual Search Tasks? The Combined Effects of Icon Type and Cognitive Aging
Jianfeng Wu,
Dongfang Jiao,
Chunfu Lu,
Chengmin Li,
Xiaofang Huang and
Suzan Weng
Additional contact information
Jianfeng Wu: Industrial Design and Research Institute, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
Dongfang Jiao: School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
Chunfu Lu: Industrial Design and Research Institute, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
Chengmin Li: School of Arts, Zhengzhou Technology and Business University, Zhengzhou 451400, China
Xiaofang Huang: College of Art and Communication, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Suzan Weng: School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 8, 1-13
Abstract:
Considering the differences in cognitive aging among older adults, this study examined how older adults process different types of graphic icons in visual search tasks. Fifty-four medical-related icons, including flat icons (FIs), FIs plus text (FIs + text), skeuomorphic icons (SIs), and SIs plus text (SIs + text), were created. The participants were divided into two groups—cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)—to complete a visual search task. According to the eye-tracking data of the participants, the search performance of the CN group was significantly better than that of the MCI group. In terms of icon types, all older adults performed better at searching for the combinations of icon and text, especially SI + text, which showed the smallest difference in the search performance between the MCI and CN groups. All older adults performed poorly when searching for FIs. The findings of this study considered the differences in cognitive aging among older adults and provided a useful reference for the icon and interface design of graphical user interfaces.
Keywords: icon type; cognitive aging; eye tracking; interface design; user performance; visual search (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4525/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4525/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4525-:d:790005
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().