Communicating about Energy Policy in a Resource-Rich Jurisdiction during the Climate Crisis: Lessons from the People of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Linda A. Selvey,
Morris Carpenter,
Mattea Lazarou and
Katherine Cullerton
Additional contact information
Linda A. Selvey: Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
Morris Carpenter: Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
Mattea Lazarou: Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
Katherine Cullerton: Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 8, 1-12
Abstract:
There is a high degree of expert consensus that anthropogenic climate change will be catastrophic if urgent and significant measures to reduce carbon emissions are not undertaken worldwide. Australia is a world-leading exporter of coal and gas, and does not have an effective emissions reduction strategy. Though many Australians support action on climate change, this has not affected voting patterns. In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore the attitudes of Australian voters in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia towards potential environmental policies. We approached people in public spaces, and invited them to participate in interviews. Six of the thirty-five interview participants who voted for the two main political parties or were undecided voters agreed with the transition to 100% renewables and/or no new coal mines in Australia. Many thought that renewables were not reliable enough and/or the economy was too dependent on coal to make the transition. There was strong support for political leadership in order to regulate mining and pollution, and for a transition plan for fossil-fuel-dependent communities. Participants were most concerned about tangible environmental issues, such as waste and pollution, and also described needing clear solutions in order to engage with the issues. Some described feeling ‘shouted at’ by protests and messaging about climate change and environmental issues. Our findings suggest that solution-based messaging may increase levels of engagement about climate change, and that waste and pollution can be entry-points for discussions about climate change. It is important to have conversations with people about this important issue.
Keywords: energy sources; messaging; attitudes; qualitative interviews; Australia; environmental issues; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4635/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4635/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4635-:d:791932
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().