Ability of Wearable Accelerometers-Based Measures to Assess the Stability of Working Postures
Liangjie Guo,
Junhui Kou and
Mingyu Wu
Additional contact information
Liangjie Guo: Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Junhui Kou: Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Mingyu Wu: Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 8, 1-20
Abstract:
With the rapid development and widespread application of wearable inertial sensors in the field of human motion capture, the low-cost and non-invasive accelerometer (ACC) based measures have been widely used for working postural stability assessment. This study systematically investigated the abilities of ACC-based measures to assess the stability of working postures in terms of the ability to detect the effects of work-related factors and the ability to classify stable and unstable working postures. Thirty young males participated in this study and performed twenty-four load-holding tasks (six working postures × two standing surfaces × two holding loads), and forty-three ACC-based measures were derived from the ACC data obtained by using a 17 inertial sensors-based motion capture system. ANOVAs, t -tests and machine learning (ML) methods were adopted to study the factors’ effects detection ability and the postural stability classification ability. The results show that almost all forty-three ACC-based measures could ( p < 0.05) detect the main effects of Working Posture and Load Carriage, and their interaction effects. However, most of them failed in ( p ≥ 0.05) detecting Standing Surface’s main or interaction effects. Five measures could detect both main and interaction effects of all the three factors, which are recommended for working postural stability assessment. The performance in postural stability classification based on ML was also good, and the feature set exerted a greater influence on the classification accuracy than sensor configuration (i.e., sensor placement locations). The results show that the pelvis and lower legs are recommended locations overall, in which the pelvis is the first choice. The findings of this study have proved that wearable ACC-based measures could assess the stability of working postures, including the work-related factors’ effects detection ability and stable-unstable working postures classification ability. However, researchers should pay more attention to the measure selection, sensors placement, feature selection and extraction in practical applications.
Keywords: working postural stability; balance assessment; wearable accelerometers; inertial measurement units; machine learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4695/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4695/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4695-:d:792974
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().