EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Validation of the German Version of the Moral Injury Symptom and Support Scale for Health Professionals (G-MISS-HP) and Its Correlation to the Second Victim Phenomenon

Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Reinhard Strametz, Bianka Gerber, Sneha Mantri and Stefan Bushuven
Additional contact information
Milena Trifunovic-Koenig: Institute for Infection Control and Infection Prevention, Health Care Association District of Constance, 78315 Konstanz, Germany
Reinhard Strametz: Wiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety, Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, 65183 Wiesbaden, Germany
Bianka Gerber: Institute for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hegau Bodensee Hospital Singen, 78224 Singen, Germany
Sneha Mantri: Department of Neurology and Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, Duke, University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Stefan Bushuven: Institute for Infection Control and Infection Prevention, Health Care Association District of Constance, 78315 Konstanz, Germany

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 8, 1-19

Abstract: Introduction: Comparable to second victim phenomenon (SVP), moral injury (MI) affects health professionals (HP) working in stressful environments. Information on how MI and SVP intercorrelate and their part in a psychological trauma complex is limited. We tested and validated a German version of the Moral Injury Symptom and Support Scale for Health Professionals (G-MISS-HP) instrument, screening for MI and correlated it with the recently developed German version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (G-SVESTR) instrument, testing for SVP. Methods: After translating Moral Injury Symptom and Support Scale for Health Professionals (MISS-HP), we conducted a cross-sectional online survey providing G-MISS-HP and G-SVEST-R to HP. Statistics included Pearson’s interitem correlation, reliability analysis, principal axis factoring and principal components analysis with Promax rotation, confirmatory factor and ROC analyses. Results: A total of 244 persons responded, of whom 156 completed the survey (33% nurses, 16% physicians, 9% geriatric nurses, 7.1% speech and language therapists). Interitem and corrected item-scale correlations did not measure for one item sufficiently. It was, therefore, excluded from further analyses. The nine-item score revealed good reliability (Guttman’s lambda 2 = 0.80; Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79). Factor validity was demonstrated, indicating that a three-factor model from the original study might better represent the data compared with our two-factor model. Positive correlations between G-MISS-HP and G-SVESTR subscales demonstrated convergent validity. ROC revealed sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 63% for G-MISS-HP using a nine-item scale with cutoff value of 28.5 points. Positive and negative predictive values were 62% and 69%, respectively. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any differences. Conclusion: G-MISS-HP with nine items is a valid and reliable testing instrument for moral injury. However, strong intercorrelations of MI and SVP indicate the need for further research on the distinction of these phenomena.

Keywords: moral injury; moral conflict; moral distress; moral stress; moral tension; moral constraint; second victim; medical error; health professionals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4857/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4857/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4857-:d:795484

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4857-:d:795484