EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China

Zhifeng Zhang, Yuping Tang, Hongyi Pan, Caiyi Yao and Tianyi Zhang
Additional contact information
Zhifeng Zhang: Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China
Yuping Tang: Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China
Hongyi Pan: Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China
Caiyi Yao: Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China
Tianyi Zhang: Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 8, 1-15

Abstract: Protected areas constitute a global strategic resource for enhancing the effectiveness of ecological protection, which can alleviate the impact of unsustainable human production and living activities on the ecological environment. However, the spatiotemporal evolution of ecological protection effectiveness needs to be quantitatively revealed. The net primary productivity (NPP) of plants is an important measure of the effectiveness of ecological protection efforts. The main purpose of this study is to use the relative change in the annual average NPP to evaluate the ecological protection effectiveness of protected areas. We compared the historical changes in the annual average NPP of protected areas in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2019. We added the spatial coordinates to the impact factor system and adopted propensity score matching (PSM) in a quasi-natural experimental method to determine the experimental group and the control group. The ecological protection effectiveness of the protected areas in the study area in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2019 was measured and classified into three types of changes in protection effectiveness, namely effective, ineffective, or fluctuating. According to the administrative level, type, and spatial distribution, we determined the number and type of changes in the protection effectiveness of different protected areas. The results show that the annual average NPP of the protected areas in Sichuan Province generally fluctuated. The annual average NPP increased in 95.47% of the total protected area and decreased in 4.53%. The overall protection effectiveness of protected areas was positive and significant and gradually improved. Effective protected areas at the national, provincial, and county levels accounted for 40.27% of the total number of protected areas, and the other 14.77% of effective protected area was managed at other administrative levels. Among the different types of protected areas, the proportion of effective protected areas was highest in wild animal protected areas, followed by forest ecology protected areas, wild plant protected areas, and wetland ecology protected areas. The results of this study can provide an important reference for the verification and improvement of the ecological protection effectiveness of various protected areas.

Keywords: protected areas; NPP; PSM; ecological protection effectiveness; Sichuan Province (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4920/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4920/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4920-:d:796467

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4920-:d:796467