EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Correspondence and Concordance of Retrospective and Concurrent Responses to Physiotherapists and Sport Psychology Questionnaire Items

Ashlee E. Groover, Britton W. Brewer, Daniel M. Smith, Judy L. Van Raalte and Christine N. May
Additional contact information
Ashlee E. Groover: Department of Psychology, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA
Britton W. Brewer: Department of Psychology, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA
Daniel M. Smith: Department of Physical Education and Health Education, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA
Judy L. Van Raalte: Department of Psychology, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA
Christine N. May: Department of Psychology, Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, USA

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 9, 1-11

Abstract: Orthopedic and sport-related injuries are a major public health concern and a common reason for referral to physical therapy. The use of psychological techniques by physical therapists has been assessed in research studies primarily with retrospective self-report questionnaires that have not been validated against concurrent assessments of the same behaviors. The primary purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which the results obtained from physical therapists’ retrospective self-reports of their use of psychological techniques reflect their use of the techniques assessed concurrently. Physical therapists ( N = 14) completed the Physiotherapists and Sport Psychology Questionnaire (PSPQ) at the beginning of this study and a checklist based on the PSPQ at the end of the sessions with patients ( N = 306). Patients also completed the checklist at the end of the sessions. Across 12 psychological techniques, the physical therapists’ retrospective (PSPQ) responses showed relatively weak correspondence (mean r = 0.31) and poor concordance with their concurrent (checklist) responses. Compared to the physical therapists’ checklist responses, the patients’ checklist responses showed weaker correspondence (mean r = 0.03) and better concordance with the physical therapists’ PSPQ responses. The findings suggest that retrospective self-reports may not accurately reflect the use of psychological techniques by physical therapists and, consequently, that physical therapists should consider documenting their use of psychological techniques as close to their implementation as possible. Suggestions for improved assessment are provided.

Keywords: measurement; physical therapy; PSPQ; orthopedic; psychology; rehabilitation; validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5106/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5106/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5106-:d:799665

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5106-:d:799665