Type of Findings Generated by the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis
Tiago S. Jesus,
Karthik Mani,
Claudia von Zweck,
Sureshkumar Kamalakannan,
Sutanuka Bhattacharjya,
Ritchard Ledgerd and
on behalf of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists
Additional contact information
Tiago S. Jesus: Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Karthik Mani: Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
Claudia von Zweck: World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Sureshkumar Kamalakannan: Department of Social Work, Education and Community Well-Being, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK
Sutanuka Bhattacharjya: Department of Occupational Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
Ritchard Ledgerd: World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
on behalf of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists: Access to membership of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists is provided in the Supplementary Materials.
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 9, 1-17
Abstract:
Occupational therapists are needed to meet the health and occupational needs of the global population, but we know little about the type of findings generated by occupational therapy workforce research conducted worldwide. We aim to synthesize these findings and their range of content to inform future investigations. A scoping review with content analysis was used. Six scientific databases, websites of official institutions, snowballing, and key informants were used for searches. Two independent reviewers took selection decisions against the eligibility criteria published a priori in the review protocol. Of the 1246 unique references detected, 57 papers were included for the last 25 years. A total of 18 papers addressed issues of attractiveness and retention, often in Australia, and 14 addressed the issues of supply, demand, and distribution, often in the US. Only these two categories generated subtopics. Many workforce issues were rarely addressed as a main topic (e.g., race/ethnic representation). Cross-national, cross-regional, or cross-professional studies generated more actionable findings. Overall, we found few discernable trends, minimal evidence of research programs, and various gaps in content coverage or in the use of contemporary research approaches. There is a need for a coordinated strengthening of the occupational therapy workforce research worldwide.
Keywords: health workforce; health personnel; human resources for health; occupational therapists; rehabilitation; review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5307/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5307/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5307-:d:803294
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().