The Role of Psychological Wellbeing in a Cross-Provider Worksite Healthcare Management Program for Employees with Musculoskeletal Disorders
Lara Lindert,
Lara Schlomann,
Holger Pfaff and
Kyung-Eun (Anna) Choi
Additional contact information
Lara Lindert: Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
Lara Schlomann: Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
Holger Pfaff: Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
Kyung-Eun (Anna) Choi: Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany
IJERPH, 2022, vol. 19, issue 9, 1-12
Abstract:
Background: Musculoskeletal and mental disorders are often comorbid, with complex correlations of pain, impairment due to pain, disability, and psychological wellbeing. This study investigates the role of psychological wellbeing in a worksite healthcare program for employees within a German randomized controlled trial. Methods: For our analyses we used data of the module for minor musculoskeletal complaints (N = 180). The intervention included a workplace-related training and case manager support. Results: Changes over time were significant in the disability score ( t (179) = 9.04, p < 0.001), pain intensity ( t (179) = 9.92, p < 0.001), and psychological wellbeing ( t (179) = −4.65, p < 0.001). Individuals with low vs. high psychological wellbeing showed significant differences in their disability score t0,t1 ( t t0 (178) = −4.230, p t0 < 0.001, t t1 (178) = −2.733, p t1 < 0.001), pain intensity t0,t1 ( t t0 (178) = −3.127, p t0 < 0.01, t t1 (178) = −3.345, p t1 < 0.01, and motivation t0 ( t t0 (178) = 4.223, p t0 < 0.001). The disability score ∆ mediates the impact of pain intensity ∆ on psychological wellbeing t1 (beta = 0.155, p < 0.05). Psychological wellbeing ∆ had an impact on the disability score t1 (beta = −0.161, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The lower the psychological wellbeing is at an intervention’s beginning, the higher the potential is for its improvement, which might affect individuals’ experienced impairment due to pain. In order to achieve the best outcomes, interventions should include both pain-related and psychological aspects. Future research needs to explore the causality of the found interrelationships further.
Keywords: disability score; pain intensity; prevention; occupational health; mental wellbeing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5452/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5452/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5452-:d:805802
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().