Association between Experiences of Different Types of Harassment or Derogatory Treatment and Sexual Harassment among Employees at a Large Swedish University

Frida Pilgaard (), Anette Agardh, Per-Olof Östergren and Gisela Priebe
Additional contact information
Frida Pilgaard: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, 202 13 Malmö, Sweden
Anette Agardh: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, 202 13 Malmö, Sweden
Per-Olof Östergren: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, 202 13 Malmö, Sweden
Gisela Priebe: Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, 202 13 Malmö, Sweden

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: Sexual harassment (SH) and other forms of mistreatment continue to be a significant problem at workplaces, leading to negative health and work-related outcomes. Previous studies have mainly examined SH and other types of workplace harassment separately. In this study we investigated whether harassment related to any of the seven Swedish legal grounds for discrimination (sex, transgender identity or expression, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation, or age) and derogatory treatment were associated with SH at a large Swedish university. Using cross-sectional survey data obtained from 33% of all staff, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between harassment, derogatory treatment, and SH. We found a sixfold increased risk of SH among women with experience of other forms of harassment and a three-times-higher risk among women with experience of derogatory treatment, indicating that SH co-occurs with other forms of mistreatment. This pattern was similar among men, although men reported lower prevalence of mistreatment. Our findings have implications for preventive strategies at academic workplaces indicating that issues related to the defence of power and various types of abusive behaviours, including SH, both need to be addressed to create more equal opportunities for all employees.

Keywords: sexual harassment; harassment; derogatory treatment; university employees; gender; academy; women’s health; workplace (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/11/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/11/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:11-:d:1008715

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().