Early Identification of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Difficulties by School Staff: A Qualitative Examination of Dutch Primary School Practices

Marloes L. Jaspers- van der Maten (), Els W. M. Rommes and Ron H. J. Scholte
Additional contact information
Marloes L. Jaspers- van der Maten: Department of Gender & Diversity Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 1908, 6500 VC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Els W. M. Rommes: Department of Gender & Diversity Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 1908, 6500 VC Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Ron H. J. Scholte: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 VC Nijmegen, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2022, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: About 16% of Dutch children are reported to have social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties (SEBDs). SEBDs generate distress and pose risks for various negative outcomes; thus, their timely identification is deemed important to respond appropriately to children’s needs and avoid such negative outcomes. Primary schools are considered convenient places to implement early SEBD identification, but the ways in which schools achieve this in practice may be inadequate, although the issue remains under-researched. Although there are several systematic school-based early identification methods (e.g., universal or selective screening), primary schools predominantly rely on school staff to recognize children at risk for, or experiencing, SEBDs. As differences in identification practices could impact whether and when (signs of) SEBDs are identified, this study aimed to increase our understanding of differences in identification practices used by school staff and their potential implications for early identification effectiveness. Thirty-four educational and clinical professionals working at nine primary schools participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. We used MAXQDA to thematically code and analyze the data. Our analysis of these interviews illustrated that schools’ identification practices differed on three elements: the frequency of observations, maintaining a four-eyes principle, and the utilization of specialist knowledge. We argue that differences in these elements have potential consequences for the timeliness and quality of SEBD identification.

Keywords: early identification; social emotional and behavioral difficulties (SEBD); primary schools; school staff; practices (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/654/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/654/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:654-:d:1019969

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().