Consumer Views and Experiences of Secondary-Care Services Following REFOCUS-PULSAR Staff Recovery-Oriented Practices Training
Michelle Kehoe (),
Ellie Fossey,
Vrinda Edan,
Lisa Chaffey,
Lisa Brophy,
Penelope June Weller,
Frances Shawyer and
Graham Meadows
Additional contact information
Michelle Kehoe: Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Peninsula Campus Building G, 47–49 Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
Ellie Fossey: Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Peninsula Campus Building G, 47–49 Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
Vrinda Edan: Centre for Mental Health Nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Lisa Chaffey: Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Peninsula Campus Building G, 47–49 Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
Lisa Brophy: Social Work and Social Policy, Department of Community and Clinical Health School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
Penelope June Weller: College of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Frances Shawyer: Southern Synergy, Monash Health, Dandenong, VIC 3175, Australia
Graham Meadows: The Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 10, 1-12
Abstract:
Background: The use of recovery-oriented practice (ROP) can be challenging to implement in mental health services. This qualitative sub-study of the Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery (PULSAR) project explored how consumers perceive their recovery following community mental health staff undertaking specific ROP training. Methods: Using a qualitative participatory methodology, 21 consumers (aged 18–63 years) participated in one-on-one interviews. A thematic analysis was applied. Results: Four main themes were extracted: (1) connection, (2) supportive relationships, (3) a better life, and (4) barriers. Connections to community and professional staff were important to support consumers in their recovery journey. Many consumers were seeking and striving towards a better life that was personal and individual to each of them, and how they made meaning around the idea of a better life. Barriers to recovery primarily focused on a lack of choice. A minor theme of ‘uncertainty’ suggested that consumers struggled to identify what their recovered future might entail. Conclusion: Despite staff undertaking the ROP training, all participants struggled to identify language and aspects of recovery in their interaction with the service, suggesting a need for staff to promote open, collaborative conversations around recovery. A specifically targeted recovery resource might facilitate such conversation.
Keywords: mental health recovery; recovery-oriented practices; community mental health care; consumers; personal recovery (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5894/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5894/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5894-:d:1151676
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().