Estimating Overall and Cause-Specific Excess Mortality during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Methodological Approaches Compared
Claudio Barbiellini Amidei,
Ugo Fedeli (),
Nicola Gennaro,
Laura Cestari,
Elena Schievano,
Manuel Zorzi,
Paolo Girardi and
Veronica Casotto
Additional contact information
Claudio Barbiellini Amidei: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Ugo Fedeli: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Nicola Gennaro: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Laura Cestari: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Elena Schievano: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Manuel Zorzi: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
Paolo Girardi: Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30172 Venice, Italy
Veronica Casotto: Epidemiological Department, Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, 35131 Padova, Italy
IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 11, 1-13
Abstract:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, excess mortality has been reported worldwide, but its magnitude has varied depending on methodological differences that hinder between-study comparability. Our aim was to estimate variability attributable to different methods, focusing on specific causes of death with different pre-pandemic trends. Monthly mortality figures observed in 2020 in the Veneto Region (Italy) were compared with those forecasted using: (1) 2018–2019 monthly average number of deaths; (2) 2015–2019 monthly average age-standardized mortality rates; (3) Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) models; (4) Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models. We analyzed deaths due to all-causes, circulatory diseases, cancer, and neurologic/mental disorders. Excess all-cause mortality estimates in 2020 across the four approaches were: +17.2% (2018–2019 average number of deaths), +9.5% (five-year average age-standardized rates), +15.2% (SARIMA), and +15.7% (GEE). For circulatory diseases (strong pre-pandemic decreasing trend), estimates were +7.1%, −4.4%, +8.4%, and +7.2%, respectively. Cancer mortality showed no relevant variations (ranging from −1.6% to −0.1%), except for the simple comparison of age-standardized mortality rates (−5.5%). The neurologic/mental disorders (with a pre-pandemic growing trend) estimated excess corresponded to +4.0%/+5.1% based on the first two approaches, while no major change could be detected based on the SARIMA and GEE models (−1.3%/+0.3%). The magnitude of excess mortality varied largely based on the methods applied to forecast mortality figures. The comparison with average age-standardized mortality rates in the previous five years diverged from the other approaches due to the lack of control over pre-existing trends. Differences across other methods were more limited, with GEE models probably representing the most versatile option.
Keywords: mortality; COVID-19; epidemiological methods; excess mortality; forecasted mortality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5941/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5941/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:5941-:d:1154508
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().