Preemption in State Tobacco Minimum Legal Sales Age Laws in the US, 2022: A Policy Analysis of State Statutes and Case Laws

Page D. Dobbs (), Ginny Chadwick, Eric Crosbie, Jessica Breslin and Lisa Henriksen
Additional contact information
Page D. Dobbs: Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, 308A HPER Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Ginny Chadwick: Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Eric Crosbie: School of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Jessica Breslin: ChangeLab Solutions, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
Lisa Henriksen: Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 11, 1-9

Abstract: Preemptive statutory language within tobacco minimum legal sales age (MLSA) laws has prohibited localities from enacting stricter laws than state statutes. With the recent uptake of state Tobacco 21 laws in the US, the current landscape of preempted MLSA laws is unknown. This study sought to update the status of preemption in MLSA laws enacted in US states between 2015–2022. A public health attorney reviewed state tobacco MLSA laws ( n = 50) and state tobacco control codes, searching for language regarding preemption. When statutes were unclear, case law was reviewed by examining local ordinances that were invalidated by state court decisions. Overall, 40 states enacted Tobacco 21 laws, seven of which expanded or introduced preemption when they increased the MLSA; a total of 26 states (52%) included preemption. Six states (12%) retained ‘savings clauses’ included in the MLSA prior to Tobacco 21, and 18 states (36%) did not mention preemption. Based on the precedent set by state courts, eight of these 18 states may preempt localities from raising their MLSA. Historically, preemption has slowed the diffusion of best practices in tobacco control, and once implemented, the laws are difficult to repeal. The recent expansion of preemption could inhibit the evolution, development, and implementation of effective tobacco control policies.

Keywords: preemption; tobacco control; tobacco law; tobacco policies; tobacco minimum legal sales age; Tobacco 21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6016/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6016/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6016-:d:1160658

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().