EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pollen Sensitization Can Increase the Allergic Reaction to Non-Cross-Reactive Allergens in a Soy-Allergic Patient

Daniela Briceno Noriega (), Huub F. J. Savelkoul, Ad Jansen, Malgorzata Teodorowicz and Janneke Ruinemans-Koerts
Additional contact information
Daniela Briceno Noriega: Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
Huub F. J. Savelkoul: Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
Ad Jansen: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Malgorzata Teodorowicz: Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
Janneke Ruinemans-Koerts: Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 11, 1-11

Abstract: During and after the pollen season, an increase in food-triggered allergic symptoms has been observed in pollen-food syndrome patients, possibly due to seasonal boosting of pollen-IgE levels. It has been suggested that consumption of birch-pollen-related foods plays a role in seasonal allergenic inflammation. However, whether this increased pollen sensitization during the pollen season can also affect the allergenicity of allergens that are non-cross-reactive with birch pollen remains in question. This study presents the case of a patient with soy allergy and pollinosis, who experiences worsening of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms during the birch pollen season even though the eliciting food factor does not cross-react with birch pollen allergens and their homologs (e.g., Bet v 1 and Gly m 4). The results showed a notable increase in sIgE for Gly m 4 (3.3 fold) and Bet v 1 (2.6 fold) during the birch pollen season compared to outside the birch pollen season, while Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 showed only a slight increase (1.5 fold). The basophil activation test (BAT) showed that in this patient Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 are clinically relevant soy allergens, which correlates with the reported clinical symptoms to processed soy. Moreover, the BAT against raw soy shows an increase in basophil activation during the birch pollen season and a negative basophil activation result outside the birch pollen season. Thus, the worsening of GI symptoms could possibly be due to an increase in IgE receptors, an over-reactive immune system, and/or significant intestinal allergic inflammation. This case highlights the importance of including allergens that do not cross-react with birch pollen and using a functional assay such as the BAT to evaluate clinical relevance when assessing birch pollen seasonal influence on soy allergenicity.

Keywords: soy allergy; basophil activation; birch pollen season; seasonality; climate change and pollen sensitization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6045/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6045/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6045-:d:1163241

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6045-:d:1163241