EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Acute Cardiopulmonary Response of High-Intensity Interval Training with Elastic Resistance vs. High-Intensity Interval Training on a Treadmill in Healthy Adults

Letícia Nascimento Santos Neves (), Victor Hugo Gasparini-Neto, Richard Diego Leite and Luciana Carletti
Additional contact information
Letícia Nascimento Santos Neves: Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Physical Education and Sports Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo (CEFD-UFES), Vitória 29075-910, ES, Brazil
Victor Hugo Gasparini-Neto: Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Physical Education and Sports Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo (CEFD-UFES), Vitória 29075-910, ES, Brazil
Richard Diego Leite: Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Physical Education and Sports Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo (CEFD-UFES), Vitória 29075-910, ES, Brazil
Luciana Carletti: Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (LAFEX), Physical Education and Sports Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo (CEFD-UFES), Vitória 29075-910, ES, Brazil

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 12, 1-13

Abstract: This study aims to describe and compare cardiopulmonary and subjective responses during high-intensity interval training with elastic resistance (EL-HIIT) and traditional high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions. Twenty-two healthy adults (27.6 ± 4.4 years) performed an EL-HIIT and a HIIT protocol consisting of 10 × 1 min at ~85% V · O 2max prescribed by cardiopulmonary-specific tests. Pulmonary parameters, heart rate (HR), blood lactate, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during exercise. Paired t -test and Cohen’s d effect size were used to compare peak and average values. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA and mixed model with Bonferroni’s post hoc test were used to compare each bout during the session. The EL-HIIT session showed higher peak and average values of HR, ventilation ( V · E ), relative and absolute oxygen uptake ( V · O 2 ), carbon dioxide production ( V · C O 2 ), and RPE than HIIT ( p < 0.05). The effect size (ES) comparing HIIT and EL-HIIT was large for HR, V · E , and lactate (≥0.8) in peak values. Comparing each bout between HIIT and EL-HIIT, no difference was found in peak values ( p > 0.05) during the session (excluding baseline, warm-up, and recovery). EL-HIIT presented a more pronounced cardiopulmonary and subjective response than HIIT.

Keywords: high-intensity interval exercise; lactate; single session; psychophysiological; subjective (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6061/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6061/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6061-:d:1164975

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6061-:d:1164975