EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can Waist-to-Height Ratio and Health Literacy Be Used in Primary Care for Prioritizing Further Assessment of People at T2DM Risk?

Elín Arnardóttir (), Árún K. Sigurðardóttir, Marit Graue, Beate-Christin Hope Kolltveit and Timothy Skinner
Additional contact information
Elín Arnardóttir: School of Health, Business and Natural Sciences, University of Akureyri, 600 Akureyri, Iceland
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir: School of Health, Business and Natural Sciences, University of Akureyri, 600 Akureyri, Iceland
Marit Graue: Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5063 Bergen, Norway
Beate-Christin Hope Kolltveit: Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5063 Bergen, Norway
Timothy Skinner: Institute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, 1017 Copenhagen K, Denmark

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 16, 1-14

Abstract: Background: To identify people at risk of type 2 diabetes. Primary health care needs efficient and noninvasive screening tools to detect individuals in need of follow-up to promote health and well-being. Previous research has shown people with lower levels of health literacy and/or well-being scores are vulnerable but may benefit from intervention and follow-up care. Aims: This cross-sectional study, aimed to identify people at risk for type 2 diabetes by comparing the Finnish Diabetes Risk instrument with the waist-to-height ratio. Further, the difference was examined in health literacy and well-being scale scores in the countryside versus town areas, respectively. Results: In total, 220, aged 18–75 years, participated. Thereof, 13.2% displayed biomarkers at prediabetes level of HbA1c (39–47 mmol/mol); none had undiagnosed diabetes. Of the participants, 73% were overweight or obese. Waist-to-height ratio demonstrated 93.1% of the prediabetes group at moderate to high health risk and 64.4% of the normal group, with an area under the curve of 0.759, sensitivity of 93.3%, and specificity of 63.1%. Residency did not influence prediabetes prevalence, health literacy, or well-being. Conclusion: Waist-to-height ratio and the Finnish Diabetes Risk instrument may be suitable for identifying who need further tests and follow-up care for health promotion in primary care.

Keywords: prediabetes; countryside/town; screening; well-being; type 2 diabetes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6606/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6606/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6606-:d:1220368

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6606-:d:1220368