Comparison of Personal or Indoor PM 2.5 Exposure Level to That of Outdoor: Over Four Seasons in Selected Urban, Industrial, and Rural Areas of South Korea: (K-IOP Study)

Chiyou Song, Chris Chaeha Lim, Birhan Legese Gurmu, Mingi Kim, Sangoon Lee, Jinsoo Park and Sungroul Kim ()
Additional contact information
Chiyou Song: Department of ICT Environmental Health System, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Chris Chaeha Lim: Department of Community, Environment and Policy, Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
Birhan Legese Gurmu: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Mingi Kim: Department of ICT Environmental Health System, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Sangoon Lee: Department of ICT Environmental Health System, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Jinsoo Park: Department of ICT Environmental Health System, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
Sungroul Kim: Department of ICT Environmental Health System, Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 17, 1-12

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the distribution of indoor, outdoor, and personal PM 2.5 (particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm) hourly concentrations measured simultaneously among 81 nonsmoking elderly participants (65 years or older) living in urban, industrial, or rural areas over 4 seasons (2 weeks per season) from November 2021 to July 2022). PM 2.5 measurements were conducted using low-cost sensors with quality control and quality assurance tests. Seasonal outdoor PM 2.5 levels were 16.4 (9.1–29.6) μg/m 3 , 20.5 (13.0–38.0) μg/m 3 , 18.2 (10.2–31.8) μg/m 3 , and 9.5 (3.8–18.7) μg/m 3 for fall, winter, spring, and summer, respectively. For indoor PM 2.5 , the median seasonal range was 5.9–7.5 μg/m 3 , and the median personal PM 2.5 exposure concentration was 8.0–9.4 μg/m 3 . This study provided seasonal distributions of IO (ratio of indoor to outdoor PM 2.5 concentration) and PO (ratio of personal to outdoor PM 2.5 concentration) using a total of 94,676 paired data points. The median seasonal IO ranged from 0.30 to 0.51 in fall, winter, and spring; its value of summer was 0.70. The median PO by season and study area were close to 1.0 in summer while it ranged 0.5 to 0.7 in other seasons, statistically significantly lower ( p < 0.05) than that in summer. Our study has revealed that the real-world exposure level to PM 2.5 among our elderly study participants might be lower than what was initially expected based on the outdoor data for most of the time. Further investigation may need to identify the reasons for the discrepancy, personal behavior patterns, and the effectiveness of any indoor air quality control system.

Keywords: personal exposure; PM 2.5; indoor; outdoor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/17/6684/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/17/6684/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:17:p:6684-:d:1229107

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().