EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Community Perceptions of Arsenic Contaminated Drinking Water and Preferences for Risk Communication in California’s San Joaquin Valley

Hollynd Boyden, Mayela Gillan, Javier Molina, Ashok Gadgil and Winston Tseng ()
Additional contact information
Hollynd Boyden: Health Research for Action, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Mayela Gillan: Health Research for Action, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Javier Molina: Health Research for Action, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Ashok Gadgil: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Winston Tseng: Health Research for Action, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Due to chronic exposure to elevated levels of arsenic in drinking water, thousands of Californians have increased risk for internal cancers and other adverse health effects. The mortality risk of cancer is 1 in 400 people exposed to above 10 μg/L of arsenic in their drinking water. The purpose of this community assessment was to understand the perceptions and awareness of the residents and public water representatives in rural, unincorporated farming communities of color in San Joaquin Valley, California. In our research, we asked 27 community informants about their (1) available water sources, (2) knowledge about the health impacts of arsenic, and (3) preferences for risk communication and education regarding the health impacts of arsenic-contaminated drinking water. Through our qualitative coding and analysis, we found that most community informants indicated that there was limited community awareness about the health effects of drinking water with elevated arsenic levels. Preferences for risk communication included using in-language, culturally relevant, and health literate health promotion strategies and teaching these topics through the local K-8 schools’ science curriculum with a language brokerage approach to transfer student knowledge to family members. Key recommendations include implementing these communication preferences to increase community-wide knowledge about safe drinking water.

Keywords: risk communication; community education; community engagement; rural community; drinking water; arsenic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/813/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/813/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:813-:d:1022299

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:813-:d:1022299