Assessing Perception of Wildfires and Related Impacts among Adult Residents of Southern California

Shahir Masri (), Erica Anne Shenoi, Dana Rose Garfin and Jun Wu ()
Additional contact information
Shahir Masri: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Erica Anne Shenoi: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Dana Rose Garfin: Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Jun Wu: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Major wildfires and their smoke pose a threat to public health and are becoming more frequent in the United States, particularly in California and other populated, fire-prone states. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how California residents view wildfires and engage in risk-reducing behaviors during wildfire events. Currently, there is a knowledge gap concerning this area of inquiry. We disseminated a 40-question cross-sectional survey to explore wildfire perception and knowledge along with related risk-reducing measures and policies among 807 adult residents in the fire-prone region of Orange County, California. Results demonstrated that nearly all (>95%) participants had (or knew someone who had) previously experienced a wildfire. Female gender, knowing a wildfire victim and reporting to have a general interest/passion for environmental issues were the three factors most strongly associated with (1) wildfires (and smoke) being reported as a threat, (2) participants’ willingness to evacuate if threatened by a nearby wildfire, and (3) participants’ willingness to support a wildfire-related tax increase ( p < 0.05). The majority (57.4%) of participants agreed that the occurrence of wildfires is influenced by climate change, with the most commonly reported risk-reducing actions (by 44% of participants) being informational actions (e.g., tracking the news) rather than self-motivated physical safety actions (e.g., using an air purifier) (29%). The results of this study can help to inform decision- and policy-making regarding future wildfire events as well as allow more targeted and effective public health messaging and intervention measures, in turn helping to reduce the risk associated with future wildfire/smoke episodes.

Keywords: wildfire; climate change; survey; global warming; risk perception (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/815/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/815/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:815-:d:1022315

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().