Working Conditions and Mental Health in a Brazilian University

Livia de Oliveira Borges (), Georgina Maria Véras Motta, Geraldo Majela Garcia-Primo, Sabrina Cavalcanti Barros and Camila Teixeira Heleno
Additional contact information
Livia de Oliveira Borges: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
Georgina Maria Véras Motta: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
Geraldo Majela Garcia-Primo: Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Brazil
Sabrina Cavalcanti Barros: Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59200-000, Brazil
Camila Teixeira Heleno: Faculdade Interdisciplinar em Humanidades, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 2, 1-19

Abstract: The highest prevalence of mental illnesses and mental suffering in contemporary society has raised awareness of the theme and their connection to work. In Brazil, university servants (professors and technical-administrative staff) are a focused occupational group. We developed this research with the objective of exploring the relationship between the perception of working conditions and the mental health of these servants. Structured questionnaires were applied to 285 servants, 33.5% being professors and 66.5% technical-administrative staff. Regarding working conditions, the questionnaires included items that measured 15 primary factors and questions about their contracts and legal conditions. To evaluate mental health, the participants answered a questionnaire about common psychic symptoms, negative and positive affects, self-esteem, and family-work conflict. We composed groups of participants according to their mental health indicator scores (cluster analysis), and after that, we compared the mean scores in working conditions for the groups. Then, we found that the mean scores of 13 from the 15 working condition factors were significantly different between the mental health groups. Our results showed the importance of improving working conditions in universities to prevent mental illnesses. Understanding the content of each working condition factor presents potency to contribute to defining the priorities among different aspects of working conditions.

Keywords: working conditions; precarious work; well-being; analysis of variance; social causation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1536/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1536/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1536-:d:1035765

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().