Chemical Profiles and Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes: An Umbrella Review and Methodological Considerations

Nargiz Travis (), Marie Knoll, Steven Cook, Hayoung Oh, Christopher J. Cadham, Luz María Sánchez-Romero and David T. Levy
Additional contact information
Nargiz Travis: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Marie Knoll: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Steven Cook: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA
Hayoung Oh: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Christopher J. Cadham: Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA
Luz María Sánchez-Romero: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
David T. Levy: Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, DC 20007, USA

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: Background: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are often marketed as a safer alternative to combustible tobacco products. The global EC market has rapidly expanded since their introduction, creating an urgent need for research describing the toxicity and chemical composition of ECs. We conducted an umbrella review to summarize the evidence from existing systematic reviews (SRs). Methods: The search for SRs was conducted across four electronic databases through 25 January 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 quality appraisal tool. Results: Twenty-five SRs were included in our umbrella review. Chemical profiles widely varied across studies included in the reviews, which was mainly attributed to the lack of standardized protocols investigating the constituents, and differences in EC devices and e-liquids tested. Metals were more abundant in some EC aerosols than cigarettes, while carbonyls were typically found at lower levels. There was consistent evidence of in vitro toxicity from EC aerosol and e-liquid exposure. AMSTAR-2 revealed important limitations across reviews. Conclusions: While most reviews concluded that ECs were likely less harmful than cigarettes, there was hesitancy to draw clear conclusions due to variable analytical procedures and inconsistent findings among the included studies. Future SRs with improved methodology and reporting are needed to adequately inform tobacco regulatory actions.

Keywords: umbrella review; toxicity; chemical profiles; constituents; electronic cigarettes; vaping (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1908/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1908/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1908-:d:1042017

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().