General and Case-Specific Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in the Public Opinion

Sahar Steiger, Julian Moeller, Julia F. Sowislo, Roselind Lieb, Undine E. Lang and Christian G. Huber ()
Additional contact information
Sahar Steiger: University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland
Julian Moeller: University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland
Julia F. Sowislo: University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland
Roselind Lieb: Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstr. 60/62, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
Undine E. Lang: University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland
Christian G. Huber: University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 3, 1-13

Abstract: Background: Psychiatric patients are subjected to considerable stigmatization, in particular, because they are considered aggressive, uncontrollable, and dangerous. This stigmatization might influence the approval of coercive measures in psychiatry by the public and healthcare professionals and might have an influence on the clinical practice of coercive measures. We examined whether the general approval of coercive measures for psychiatric patients with dangerous behaviors differs from case-specific approval. Method: We conducted a representative survey of the general population ( n = 2207) in the canton of Basel-Stadt, Switzerland. In total, 1107 participants assessed a case vignette depicting a fictitious character with a mental illness and indicated whether they would accept coercive measures (involuntary hospitalization, involuntary medication, and seclusion) for the person in the vignette. It was explicitly stated that within the last month, the fictitious character displayed no dangerous behavior (Vignette ND) or dangerous behavior (Vignette D). Another 1100 participants were asked whether they would approve coercive measures (involuntary hospitalization, involuntary medication, and seclusion) for psychiatric patients with dangerous behavior in general (General D), i.e., without having received or referring to a specific case vignette. Findings: The logistic regression model containing all variables explained 45% of the variance in approval of any type of coercive measures. Assessment of case vignettes without dangerous behavior (Vignette ND) was associated with significantly reduced approval of coercive measures compared to assessment of a case vignette with dangerousness (Vignette D), while approval for coercive measures in a person with mental health disorder with dangerous behavior in general (General D) was significantly higher than for the case vignette with dangerousness. Conclusions: The general approval of coercive measures for people with mental disorders seems to differ depending on if the respondents are asked to give a general assessment or to examine a specific and detailed clinical case vignette, indicating an increased role of stigmatization when asking about generalized assessments. This may contribute to diverging findings on the acceptance of coercive measures in the literature and should be considered when designing future studies.

Keywords: stigmatization; mental illness; dangerousness; familiarity; general population (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2081/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2081/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2081-:d:1045003

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().