Acceptability of School Menus: A Systematic Review of Assessment Methods

Síntia Almeida Santana (), Sueny Andrade Batista, Dayanne da Costa Maynard, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Renata Puppin Zandonadi () and Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Additional contact information
Síntia Almeida Santana: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Sueny Andrade Batista: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Dayanne da Costa Maynard: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Verônica Cortez Ginani: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Renata Puppin Zandonadi: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho: Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 3, 1-48

Abstract: The school meal promotes healthy eating habits through nutritionally adequate preparations. Consequently, it prevents obesity and malnutrition, favoring learning. This systematic review aimed at investigating the methods for evaluating the acceptance of school menus offered by school feeding programs (SFPs) around the world. Specific search strategies were conducted on PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Global. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Meta-Analysis Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument. A total of 89 studies were included. The countries with the highest number of studies were Brazil ( n = 42), South Korea ( n = 13), and the United States ( n = 12). The most used methods (69.66%) were numerical scales, with a higher prevalence for the 5-point scale (50.56%). Other methods included questionnaires and/or interviews with objective and/or subjective questions (44.94%); and mathematical formulas and/or visual estimates evaluating the consumption of food and leftovers (40.45%). The prevalent use of the 5-point hedonic scale may be due to its low cost, simplicity, ease of elaboration, application speed, and student understanding. Mathematical formulas and/or visual estimation were used by about 40% of the studies, but it is difficult to compare studies.

Keywords: food consumption; students; school feeding; acceptability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2242/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2242/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2242-:d:1047802

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().