Threshold Effect of Environmental Regulation and Green Innovation Efficiency: From the Perspective of Chinese Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Protection Inputs
Liang Liu,
Yuting Zhao,
Xiujuan Gong,
Shu Liu,
Mengyue Li,
Yirui Yang and
Pan Jiang ()
Additional contact information
Liang Liu: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Yuting Zhao: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Xiujuan Gong: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Shu Liu: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Mengyue Li: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Yirui Yang: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
Pan Jiang: School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 5, 1-17
Abstract:
In the context of China’s 14th Five-Year Plan and 2035 visionary goals of national economic and social development, to achieve the national dual carbon goals, an innovation-driven green development strategy must be implemented, and the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation efficiency must be clarified. Based on the DEA-SBM model, in this study, we measured the green innovation efficiency of 30 provinces and cities in China from 2011 to 2020 by introducing environmental regulation as the core explanatory variable, and two threshold variables, environmental protection input and fiscal decentralization, to empirically analyze the threshold effect of environmental regulation on green innovation efficiency. We found that: (1) The green innovation efficiency of 30 provinces and municipalities in China is spatially distributed as strong in the east and weak in the west. (2) A double-threshold effect exists with environmental protection input as the threshold variable. Environmental regulation showed an inverted N-shaped relationship of first inhibiting, then promoting, and finally inhibiting green innovation efficiency. (3) A double-threshold effect exists with fiscal decentralization as the threshold variable. Environmental regulation showed an inverted N-shaped relationship of inhibiting, promoting, and then inhibiting green innovation efficiency. The study results provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for China to achieve the dual carbon goal.
Keywords: environmental regulation; green innovation efficiency; environmental protection input; fiscal decentralization; threshold effect; DEA-SBM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3905/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3905/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3905-:d:1076877
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().