Information Gathering about Pregnancy, Birth, and Puerperium—Good and Fake Information

Oezden Oyman, Joy Fest, Roland Zimmermann, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble and Ladina Vonzun ()
Additional contact information
Oezden Oyman: Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
Joy Fest: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baden Regional Hospital, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
Roland Zimmermann: Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble: Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
Ladina Vonzun: Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 6, 1-9

Abstract: Recent research on the subject of information-gathering processes among pregnant women has revealed a shift towards online sources. Health professionals’ knowledge about sources of information has been shown to improve the understanding and counseling of patients. The objective of this study was to create an overview of all types of sources relevant to information gathering and to put their role and perception into perspective. Methods: A total of 249 women were included in this study and recruited over a period of one month at the University Hospital of Zurich (USZ). Exclusion criteria included cases of fetal demise and late abortions. The survey on information-gathering processes was divided into three stages: pregnancy, birth, and puerperium. The different sources of information were compared based on women’s characteristics. Results: The response rate was 78% (n = 197). The main findings include a significant difference in information gathering based on varying levels of education, with women at the lowest educational level using the Internet the least during pregnancy ( p = 0.029). During puerperium, significant differences could be observed in the involvement of the gynecologist. Primipara women as well as women of lower educational levels contacted their gynecologist less in contrast to multipara women ( p = 0.006) and women of higher educational levels ( p = 0.011). Overall, health professionals were considered to be the most important source of information. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that parity and educational level influence the information-gathering process. As the most important source for information gathering, health professionals must use this advantage to better assist their patients in accessing reliable information.

Keywords: information; pregnancy; Internet; health professionals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4848/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4848/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4848-:d:1092673

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().