EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effects of Different Rapid Weight Loss Strategies and Percentages on Performance-Related Parameters in Combat Sports: An Updated Systematic Review

Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda (), Manuel Sanz-Matesanz, Guillermo Orozco-Durán, Francisco Tomás González-Fernández, Lorena Rodríguez-García and Amelia Guadalupe-Grau ()
Additional contact information
Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda: Physical Performance & Athletic Research Center, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain
Manuel Sanz-Matesanz: Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of Murcia, Guadalupe, 30107 Murcia, Spain
Guillermo Orozco-Durán: Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of Murcia, Guadalupe, 30107 Murcia, Spain
Francisco Tomás González-Fernández: Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Lorena Rodríguez-García: Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Pontifical University of Comillas, CESAG, 07013 Palma, Spain
Amelia Guadalupe-Grau: GENUD Toledo Research Group, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 45002 Toledo, Spain

IJERPH, 2023, vol. 20, issue 6, 1-19

Abstract: Most combat sports (CS) are structured in weight categories, and it is very common to carry out body weight adjustment strategies in order to compete in lower weight categories. For this reason, different rapid weight loss (RWL) strategies are usually performed to pass the pre-competition weigh-in test, and then a replenishment of fluids and carbohydrate-rich foods is conducted in an attempt to recover the weight and avoid a performance loss. In this context, no clear references have been found on whether these types of strategies have negative effects, impairing the athlete’s combat and/or physical performance. For this reason, the aim of this study was to review the scientific literature on the effect of rapid weight reduction strategies on the performance of CS athletes. A literature search was performed through four different databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect). Four inclusion criteria were established as follows: (1) the subjects had to be competitors in the CS and carry out RWL strategies; (2) at least two measurement points, that is, normal conditions and dehydration condition; (3) measurements in a real competition or simulating the same conditions; (4) original research articles written in English or Spanish and available in full text. Finally, a total of 16 articles were finally included in this research. All subjects ( n = 184) were athletes from combat disciplines, with a minimum of 3–4 years of practice, as well as with certain experience in RWL. Six of the studies reported that an RWL strategy of around 5% of body weight loss did not affect performance parameters. However, the other ten studies with RWL between 3 and 6% or even higher reported negative effects or impairments on different parameters related to performance and/or athlete’s psychophysiology, such as perceived fatigue, mood states, strength and power production, as well as changes in hormonal, blood and urine parameters, body composition, or the kinematics of the technical gesture. Although there is still no clear answer to the issue approached in this research, in general terms, it seems that in order to guarantee an acceptable athletic performance of the competitor, the weight loss should not exceed 3% to ≤5% of body weight together with ≥24 h for adequate (or at least partial) recovery and rehydration processes. In addition, it is highly recommended to lose weight progressively over several weeks, especially focusing on competitions lasting several days, as well as multiple rounds or qualifying stages.

Keywords: recovery; weight loss; weigh-in; hydration; competitive performance; fight; striking sports (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5158/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5158-:d:1097753

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5158-:d:1097753