Job Satisfaction of Nurses in the Context of Clinical Supervision: A Systematic Review
Ali Hudays (),
Faye Gary,
Joachim G. Voss,
Ahmed Hazazi,
Amal Arishi and
Fatimah Al-sakran
Additional contact information
Ali Hudays: Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Faye Gary: Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Joachim G. Voss: Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Ahmed Hazazi: Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 13316, Saudi Arabia
Amal Arishi: Medical Surgical Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
Fatimah Al-sakran: Community, Psychiatric, and Mental Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
IJERPH, 2023, vol. 21, issue 1, 1-19
Abstract:
The purpose of this systematic review is to gather and analyze data from existing research on the effects of clinical supervision (CS) intervention on nurses’ job satisfaction and related outcomes such as stress levels, burnout, and care quality. Using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) criteria, a systematic review of the research available in the databases PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, well as Google Scholar, between January 2010 and May 2023 was carried out. Out of the 760 studies assessed, only 8 met the criteria for inclusion in the review based on Hawker’s assessment tool. The results indicate that CS has a positive impact on nurses’ job satisfaction and related outcomes such as reduced burnout, stress levels, and the quality of care. The study also found that the effectiveness of CS in enhancing job satisfaction was most evident during the 6-month follow-up period. However, nurses who did not receive CS did not show any noticeable improvement in their knowledge or practice. Additionally, nurses who required more efficient clinical oversight reported little to no positive impact on their practice or training. The review also highlighted gaps in knowledge regarding the frequency and number of sessions required for the impact of CS on nurses’ job satisfaction and other outcomes. Due to the limited number of studies included in this review, further research is recommended to evaluate the influence of CS on nurses’ job satisfaction.
Keywords: clinical supervision; job satisfaction; stress; burnout; registered nurses; psychiatric nurses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/6/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/6/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2023:i:1:p:6-:d:1303943
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().