Development of Priority Assistive Product Lists in Three African Countries

Emma M. Smith (), Ying Zhang, Laura Ligthart and Ikenna D. Ebuenyi
Additional contact information
Emma M. Smith: Assisting Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University, W23 H2H6 Maynooth, Ireland
Ying Zhang: Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Laura Ligthart: Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ikenna D. Ebuenyi: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 11, 1-15

Abstract: National Assistive Product Lists (APLs) play an important role in improving access to assistive products (APs). Assistive products are critical to enhancing the health, well-being, and quality of life of persons with disabilities and other functional limitations, including those associated with aging. Comparing national APL development across Malawi, Liberia, and Sierra Leone may provide insight into the differences between the resulting national APLs and how to enhance AP service delivery systems. The aim of this study was to compare how the World Health Organization’s 5Ps model (people, personnel, policy, provision, products) influenced national APL development across Malawi, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. To achieve this aim, we conducted a series of qualitative interviews with representatives of key government and non-state organizations (n = 12) who had been involved in the development of the APL in each of the three countries. We used directed content analysis to review and analyze the resulting data, with the 5Ps representing the 5 areas of analysis. Our results found substantial differences between the APLs of the three countries, which were substantially influenced by the needs of assistive technology users in each of the respective countries (people). This was evident in the fact that product selection criteria differed across countries, with the most critical factor being population need. Provision systems were generally fragmented and depended heavily on donors, with a lack of coordination between the public and private sectors. None of the countries had or produced a standalone AT policy in the APL development process. County-specific factors also influenced the APL differences between countries. Our research concludes that national APLs will vary substantially if they are developed collaboratively, considering the needs of the population with consideration for the country’s context and existing policies and systems.

Keywords: assistive technology; products; policy; African (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/11/1393/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/11/1393/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:11:p:1393-:d:1504570

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().