Co-Production Within Academic Constraints: Insights from a Case Study

Evelyn Callahan, Niamh Murtagh (), Alison Pooley, Jenny Pannell and Alison Benzimra
Additional contact information
Evelyn Callahan: The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK
Niamh Murtagh: The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK
Alison Pooley: Suffolk Sustainability Institute, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK
Jenny Pannell: The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK
Alison Benzimra: United St Saviour’s Charity, London SE1 3JW, UK

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 11, 1-15

Abstract: Co-production in research offers the potential for multiple benefits, including amplifying the voices of the marginalised, reducing power inequalities between academic researchers and co-researchers outside of academia, increased likelihood of impact, and improvement in the research process. But alongside increased interest in co-production, there is increased awareness of its contextual constraints. Key amongst these are institutional orthodoxies in academia, including time-limited, project-based research and precarious employment for junior researchers. To examine how the potential benefits of co-production can be achieved within the constraints of current academic systems, a case study project was assessed against a documented set of expectations for the co-production of research with older adults. The case study was a research project conducted with seven almshouse communities in England on the topic of social resilience. The wider almshouse communities—staff, trustees, and residents—were involved in co-production. The assessment concluded that co-production led to rich data and deep understanding. Co-production aided the development of skills and experiences of the co-researchers, resulted in changes in practice, and challenged power differentials, albeit in limited ways, but could not ensure the sustainability of relationships or impact. Key elements for effective co-production included the approach to and governance of the project, the formation of a Residents Advisory Group, and planning for the limited commitment that individuals and organisations outside of academia may be able to contribute to research.

Keywords: co-production; co-research; almshouse; housing; power; social (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/11/1503/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/11/1503/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:11:p:1503-:d:1519595

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().