EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Reciprocal Effects of Prosociality, Peer Support and Psychological Well-Being in Adolescence: A Four-Wave Longitudinal Study

Gaetana Affuso (), Nicola Picone, Grazia De Angelis, Mirella Dragone, Concetta Esposito, Maddalena Pannone, Anna Zannone and Dario Bacchini
Additional contact information
Gaetana Affuso: Department of Psychology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Nicola Picone: Department of Psychology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Grazia De Angelis: Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Pegaso University, 80143 Napoli, Italy
Mirella Dragone: Faculty of Law, Giustino Fortunato University, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Concetta Esposito: Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80133 Napoli, Italy
Maddalena Pannone: Department of Psychology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Anna Zannone: Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80133 Napoli, Italy
Dario Bacchini: Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80133 Napoli, Italy

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 12, 1-14

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyze the reciprocal effects between prosociality, peer support and psychological well-being using a four-wave longitudinal study and a within-person analytical approach (random intercept cross-lagged panel model, RI-CLPM). A sample of 587 adolescents (males = 308; M age = 14.23, SD = 0.58) enrolled in the first year of high school (9th grade) were recruited and followed over four years from 2016 (Time 1 [T1]) to 2019 (Time 4 [T4]). Once a year, they filled in a questionnaire measuring prosociality, peer support, and psychological well-being. The results from the RI-CLPM revealed that, at the between-person level, prosociality, peer support and psychological well-being were all positively associated. Conversely, at the within-person level and at all survey points, only psychological well-being positively predicted prosociality one year later. Specifically, we found that adolescents with higher levels of psychological well-being were more likely to show a tendency for prosocial behaviors over time. Promoting interventions aimed at enhancing psychological well-being may make adolescents more likely to engage in positive behaviors, such as prosocial ones, in a variety of contexts, thereby creating favorable social environments.

Keywords: prosociality; peer support; psychological well-being; cross-lagged panel model; random intercept cross-lagged panel model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1630/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/12/1630/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1630-:d:1538681

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:12:p:1630-:d:1538681