Implementing E-Cigarettes as an Alternate Smoking Cessation Tool during Pregnancy: A Process Evaluation at Two UK Sites

Eleanor Lutman-White, Riya Patel, Deborah Lycett, Kelly Hayward, Ruth Sampson, Janani Arulrajah and Maxine Whelan ()
Additional contact information
Eleanor Lutman-White: Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK
Riya Patel: Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK
Deborah Lycett: Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK
Kelly Hayward: Warwickshire Public Health Team, Warwick CV34 4RL, UK
Ruth Sampson: Bath and North Somerset Public Health Team, Bristol BA1 1JQ, UK
Janani Arulrajah: Bath and North Somerset Public Health Team, Bristol BA1 1JQ, UK
Maxine Whelan: Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse maternal and foetal health outcomes, with effective smoking cessation support important. E-cigarette use in the general population has increased rapidly in recent years, with their use viewed as an alternate, additional offer to nicotine-replacement therapy and behavioural support. However, their use in pregnancy has limited investigation. This study aimed to understand how two e-cigarette pilots for pregnant women were delivered and implemented. Referrals to the general stop smoking in pregnancy service, as well as pilot enrolment, engagement and outcomes were recorded. Seven professionals involved in pilot 2 design, setup and/or delivery took part in semi-structured interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Transcripts were deductively coded into CFIR. In total, 124 of 296 women accessed at least one visit after being contacted and offered the e-cigarette pilot (Pilot 1: N = 99, Pilot 2: N = 25). In Pilot 2, 13 (of 25) reached 4 weeks, and common reasons for withdrawal by 12 weeks included relapse, loss of contact and no further support wanted. Forty-five (36.3%) validated quits were reported (Pilot 1: 32 of 99 (32.3%); Pilot 2: 13 of 25 (52%)). Facilitators included regular communication and the advisors physically taking e-cigarettes to home visits. Barriers included misalignment between the pilot and the standard treatment offer and availability of the staff resource. Enrolment to both pilots was demonstrated, with greater enrolment in one pilot and notable quit rates among women across both pilots. The perceived role of e-cigarettes for pregnant women varied, and a lack of staff resources explained some challenges. Adaptations may be needed during scale-up, including additional resources and the alignment of the e-cigarette provision to standard treatment.

Keywords: implementation; process evaluation; smoking cessation; pregnancy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/291/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/291/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:291-:d:1349985

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().