Impact of Stress during COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: A Study on Dispositional and Behavioral Dimensions for Supporting Evidence-Based Targeted Strategies

Giuseppe Alessio Platania, Simone Varrasi (), Claudia Savia Guerrera, Francesco Maria Boccaccio, Vittoria Torre, Venera Francesca Vezzosi, Concetta Pirrone and Sabrina Castellano
Additional contact information
Giuseppe Alessio Platania: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Simone Varrasi: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Claudia Savia Guerrera: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Francesco Maria Boccaccio: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Vittoria Torre: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Venera Francesca Vezzosi: Unità Operativa Complessa di Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Presidio Ospedaliero di Acireale, ASP 3 Catania, 95024 Acireale, Italy
Concetta Pirrone: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
Sabrina Castellano: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 3, 1-15

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic caused critical mental health issues and lifestyle disruptions. The aim of this study was to explore, during the lockdown of second-wave contagions in Italy, how stress was affected by dispositional (personality factors and intolerance to uncertainty) and behavioral (coping strategies) dimensions, how these variables differed among sex, age, educational, professional, and health groups, and how the various changes in work and daily routine intervened in the psychological impact of the emergency. Our results highlight that women, the youngs, students/trainees, those with chronic diseases, those who stopped their jobs due to restrictions, and those who left home less than twice a week were more stressed, while health professionals showed lower levels of the same construct. Those with higher levels of stress used more coping strategies based on avoidance, which positively correlated with age, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and intolerance to uncertainty, and negatively with openness. Stress levels also positively correlated with agreeableness, conscientiousness, intolerance to uncertainty, and seeking of social support, and negatively with openness, a positive attitude, and a transcendent orientation. Finally, stress was predicted mainly by behavioral dimensions. Our results are discussed and framed within the literature, as important insights for targeted intervention strategies to promote health even in emergencies.

Keywords: COVID-19; stress; personality factors; intolerance to uncertainty; coping strategies; interventions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/330/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/330/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:330-:d:1355467

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().