Interplay of Dyadic Consensus, Reflective Functioning, and Perinatal Affective Difficulties in Modulating Fear of COVID-19 among First-Time Mothers: A Mediation Analysis

Andrea Fontana (), Sonia Mangialavori, Grazia Terrone, Lucrezia Trani, Eleonora Topino, Valeria Trincia, Giulia Lisi, Giuseppe Ducci and Marco Cacioppo
Additional contact information
Andrea Fontana: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy
Sonia Mangialavori: Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
Grazia Terrone: Department of History, Cultural Heritage, Education and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
Lucrezia Trani: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy
Eleonora Topino: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy
Valeria Trincia: Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy
Giulia Lisi: Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy
Giuseppe Ducci: Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy
Marco Cacioppo: Department of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 7, 1-11

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated fears and anxieties, potentially influencing maternal perinatal mental health. This study addresses a gap in the literature on fear of COVID-19 in pregnant women, aiming to identify contributing factors. Method: Participants were 401 primiparous women with an average age of 34 years (SD = 4.56) who were recruited through the National Health System during birth support courses. They completed a series of self-reported instruments via an online survey, providing information on their levels of reflective functioning, dyadic consensus, perinatal maternal affectivity, and fear of COVID-19. Pearson’s correlation and mediation analysis via a generalized linear model were implemented to analyze the collected data. Results: The relationship between dyadic consensus and fear of COVID-19 was significant and negative. Furthermore, a significant parallel mediation involving perinatal maternal affectivity and reflective functioning was found to the extent that, when these factors were inserted into the model, the direct association between dyadic consensus and fear of COVID-19 became non-significant (total mediation). Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of dyadic adjustment in alleviating maternal COVID-19 fear, emphasizing interventions promoting couple functioning, mentalization, and addressing affective difficulties. Such approaches are vital for supporting expecting mothers during challenging times like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: fear of COVID-19; dyadic adjustment; perinatal affective symptoms; reflective functioning; pregnant women (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/848/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/848/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:848-:d:1424999

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().