Factors Associated with Legionella Detection in the Water Systems of National Lodging Organization Facilities with Water Management Programs in the United States

Rebecca Kahn (), Gordana Derado, Elizabeth J. Hannapel, Patrick Vander Kelen, Jasen M. Kunz and Chris Edens
Additional contact information
Rebecca Kahn: Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
Gordana Derado: Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
Elizabeth J. Hannapel: Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
Patrick Vander Kelen: Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
Jasen M. Kunz: Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
Chris Edens: Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 7, 1-11

Abstract: A better understanding of risk factors and the predictive capability of water management program (WMP) data in detecting Legionella are needed to inform the efforts aimed at reducing Legionella growth and preventing outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease. Using WMPs and Legionella testing data from a national lodging organization in the United States, we aimed to (1) identify factors associated with Legionella detection and (2) assess the ability of WMP disinfectant and temperature metrics to predict Legionella detection. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to identify WMP metrics associated with Legionella serogroup 1 (SG1) detection. We also estimated the predictive values for each of the WMP metrics and SG1 detection. Of 5435 testing observations from 2018 to 2020, 411 (7.6%) had SG1 detection, and 1606 (29.5%) had either SG1 or non-SG1 detection. We found failures in commonly collected WMP metrics, particularly at the primary test point for total disinfectant levels in hot water, to be associated with SG1 detection. These findings highlight that establishing and regularly monitoring water quality parameters for WMPs may be important for preventing Legionella growth and subsequent disease. However, while unsuitable water quality parameter results are associated with Legionella detection, this study found that they had poor predictive value, due in part to the low prevalence of SG1 detection in this dataset. These findings suggest that Legionella testing provides critical information to validate if a WMP is working, which cannot be obtained through water quality parameter measurements alone.

Keywords: Legionella; Legionnaires’ disease; water management programs; national lodging organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/939/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/939/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:939-:d:1438071

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().