EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluating Food Procurement against the EAT- Lancet Planetary Health Diet in a Sample of U.S. Universities

Jaclyn Bertoldo (), Abby Fammartino, Sophie Egan, Roni A. Neff, Rebecca Grekin and Julia A. Wolfson
Additional contact information
Jaclyn Bertoldo: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Abby Fammartino: Strategic Initiatives Group, Culinary Institute of America, Hyde Park, NY 12538, USA
Sophie Egan: R&DE Stanford Food Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Roni A. Neff: Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Rebecca Grekin: Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Julia A. Wolfson: Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

IJERPH, 2024, vol. 21, issue 7, 1-16

Abstract: Aligning institutional food procurement with planetary health targets offers opportunities to improve nutrition and reduce food-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study compared foods procured by 19 university dining programs in the U.S. in 2022 with the EAT- Lancet planetary health diet. Each university’s procurement was then modeled to align with the EAT- Lancet planetary health diet, and changes to Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores and GHG emissions were evaluated. For a subset of universities that provided cost data, changes in annual total food costs were also estimated. Universities in this study exceeded EAT- Lancet planetary health targets for beef ( x - = 657% of target), pork ( x - = 587%), poultry ( x - = 379%), and eggs ( x - = 293%). All universities failed to achieve planetary health targets for legumes and nuts ( x - = 39% of the target) and vegetables ( x - = 68%). Aligning food procurement with the planetary health diet would result in an estimated average 46.1% reduction in GHG emissions and a 19.7 point increase in HEI scores. Universities that provided cost data saw an average 9.7% reduction in food costs in the EAT- Lancet -aligned scenario. The procurement metrics assessed in this study can help university dining programs and other institutional food service organizations set goals and monitor progress toward planetary health targets.

Keywords: nutrition; healthy diets; food systems; food procurement; planetary health; climate change; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/945/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/945/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:945-:d:1438623

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:945-:d:1438623