Undocumented Migrants’ Experiences of a Recovery-Oriented Group Intervention and Its Impact on Their Mental Well-Being: A Qualitative Study

Zoë Nieuwhof (), Maaike Kooiman (), Willem F. Scholte, Marianne Reddingius and Martha Teijema
Additional contact information
Zoë Nieuwhof: Doctors of the World, 1018 DP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Maaike Kooiman: Doctors of the World, 1018 DP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Willem F. Scholte: Laguna Collective, 1074 EG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marianne Reddingius: Doctors of the World, 1018 DP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Martha Teijema: Doctors of the World, 1018 DP Amsterdam, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 11, 1-15

Abstract: The Method for the Empowerment of Trauma Survivors (METS) is a recovery-oriented group intervention tailored to refugees and asylum seekers who experienced traumatic events. This study explores how undocumented migrants in the Netherlands experience participation in METS, how these experiences relate to changes in their mental well-being, and which aspects of the intervention participants find most valuable. A qualitative case study was conducted involving in-depth, individual interviews with undocumented migrants who participated in METS. Interviews focused on participants’ experiences with the intervention and perceived changes in mental well-being. Five main themes emerged: connectedness, group dynamics, personal development, emotional well-being, and practical aspects. Changes in mental well-being were often subtle, difficult to articulate, and in some cases temporary. While some participants reported positive developments, many continued to face significant challenges and did not experience notable improvement. No participants reported negative outcomes as a result of participation. METS appears suitable for a heterogeneous population with diverse cultural, religious, and educational backgrounds. Reported benefits often related to group participation rather than METS-specific characteristics. Future research is warranted to further explore whether METS is a valuable addition to existing transdiagnostic psychosocial group interventions.

Keywords: personal recovery; undocumented migrants; mental health; METS; CHIME; refugees; asylum seekers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1617/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1617/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1617-:d:1778226

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().