Lessons Learned from Air Quality Assessments in Communities Living near Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

Custodio Muianga (), John Wilhelmi, Jennifer Przybyla, Melissa Smith and Gregory M. Zarus
Additional contact information
Custodio Muianga: Office of Innovation and Analytics (OIA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
John Wilhelmi: Eastern Research Group, Inc., Boston, MA 02109, USA
Jennifer Przybyla: Office of Innovation and Analytics (OIA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Melissa Smith: Office of Innovation and Analytics (OIA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
Gregory M. Zarus: Office of Innovation and Analytics (OIA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Atlanta, GA 30341, USA

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 11, 1-22

Abstract: Over 292 million tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) are generated annually in the United States, with more than half disposed of in landfills. Municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs) are stationary sources of air pollution and potential health risks for nearby communities. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has completed over 300 public health assessments (PHAs) and related investigations at MSWLFs and open dumps since the 1980s. This paper reviews the ATSDR’s evaluations of air pathway concerns at 125 MSWLF sites assessed between 1988 and early 2025, with many being evaluated during the 1990s. Most sites were located in the Midwest and Northeast, and only 25% remained active. The ATSDR found no air-related public health hazard at 86% of sites. At sites where hazards were identified, common issues included elevated outdoor or indoor toxicants (e.g., hydrogen sulfide, benzene, trichloroethylene, and mercury) and unsafe methane accumulations. Contributing factors included older site designs, inadequate gas-collection, subsurface fires, and distance from nearby residences. Corrective actions effectively reduced exposures at the affected sites. Results suggest that well-located and maintained landfills minimize public health hazards, while aging or poorly managed sites pose risks. Continued monitoring and research are warranted as waste management shifts toward reducing, reusing, recycling, composting, and energy-recovery technologies to improve efficiency, advance technologies, and address systemic public health challenges.

Keywords: emissions; landfills; community actions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1732/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1732/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1732-:d:1795460

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().