Poison Center Surveillance of Occupational Incidents with Hazardous Materials (2016–2023): Insights for Risk Mitigation and Incident Preparedness

Anja P. G. Wijnands (), Arjen Koppen, Irma de Vries, Dylan W. de Lange and Saskia J. Rietjens
Additional contact information
Anja P. G. Wijnands: Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Arjen Koppen: Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Irma de Vries: Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Dylan W. de Lange: Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Saskia J. Rietjens: Dutch Poisons Information Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 2, 1-14

Abstract: Incidents involving hazardous materials (HAZMAT incidents) can impact human health and the environment. For the development of risk mitigation strategies, it is essential to understand the circumstances of such incidents. A retrospective study (2016–2023) of acute occupational HAZMAT incidents involving multiple patients (>1, including workers, emergency responders and bystanders) reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center was conducted. We only included incidents that occurred during the performance of work or as a result of a disruption of a work-related process. Patient characteristics, exposure circumstances (such as the substances involved, chemical phase, and type of release (e.g., spill/release or fire/explosion)) and business classes were analyzed to identify risk factors. From 2016 to 2023, the DPIC was consulted about 516 HAZMAT incidents. Inhalation was the most common route of exposure (89%). Patients were often exposed to chemical asphyxiants (n = 156) and acids ( n = 151). Most incidents occurred in fixed facilities ( n = 447), while 49 incidents occurred during transport. The primary cause was a spill/release ( n = 414), followed by a fire/explosion ( n = 65). Most patients were exposed to a gas/vapor ( n = 421), followed by a liquid ( n = 59) or solid ( n = 28). Incidents frequently occurred in industry (20%). The majority of patients reported mild to moderate health effects. Surveillance data on HAZMAT incidents are essential for incident preparedness. Poison Center data can help identify risk factors, which can be used to develop risk mitigation strategies to prevent future incidents.

Keywords: HAZMAT incidents; chemical incidents; surveillance; public health risks; poison information centers; prevention; risk mitigation strategies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/158/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/158/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:158-:d:1576738

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().