Surveys of Knowledge and Awareness of Plastic Pollution and Risk Reduction Behavior in the General Population: A Systematic Review

Caterina Caminiti, Francesca Diodati, Matteo Puntoni (), Denisa Balan and Giuseppe Maglietta
Additional contact information
Caterina Caminiti: Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
Francesca Diodati: Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
Matteo Puntoni: Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
Denisa Balan: Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
Giuseppe Maglietta: Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 2, 1-27

Abstract: Individual attitudes and knowledge can predict pro-environmental behaviors. Public surveys, therefore, can provide precious information, which can guide sensitization interventions. In this systematic review, we searched Medline and Embase, with no language or date restrictions, for surveys designed to measure in the general population the level of knowledge about different types of plastics, the risks associated with plastic pollution, and awareness of actions to reduce them. Survey tools were analyzed following the guide of Burns and Kho, and study methodological quality was assessed via the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. We included 17 articles published from 2019 to 2024, mostly concerning European populations. The tools comprised a median of 13 items (range 7–50), and very differently formulated questions. Overall, 13/17 (76.5%) study questionnaires received less than 50% (<3.5) of the maximum possible score. The remaining four questionnaires obtained intermediate scores (between 3.5 and 5.3) indicating moderate quality. Most studies did not employ the appropriate cross-sectional survey methodology, only two studies statistically justified sample sizes, only three reported a sampling frame, and only two described a selection process that appears to be representative. In most cases, the instruments were not validated, and the statistical significance of key variables was not provided. The many shortcomings highlighted in this review emphasize the urgent need for methodological rigor when conducting survey studies, which are essential tools for public health.

Keywords: plastics; environment; pollution; knowledge; awareness; public health; questionnaire; survey; systematic review; cross-sectional (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/177/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/177/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:177-:d:1578704

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().