Perceived Harm to Pet Health Associated with Human Quality of Life After a Public Health Disaster

Diana K. Haggerty, Robert Wahl (), Nicole Jones, Jenny LaChance and Mona Hanna
Additional contact information
Diana K. Haggerty: Michigan State University–Hurley Children’s Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA
Robert Wahl: Michigan State University–Hurley Children’s Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA
Nicole Jones: Michigan State University–Hurley Children’s Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA
Jenny LaChance: Michigan State University–Hurley Children’s Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA
Mona Hanna: Michigan State University–Hurley Children’s Hospital Pediatric Public Health Initiative, Charles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 2, 1-10

Abstract: This study’s goal was to evaluate associations of human exposure to unfiltered tap water during the Flint water crisis (FWC) with perceived harm to pets from exposure to contaminated water. We also explored the associations of perceived pet harm with participants’ self-reported general, physical, and mental health, as well as quality of life. Adult ( n = 3264) pet owners from a public health registry reported unfiltered tap water exposure, perceived pet health, and general health/quality of life at baseline, as well as health/quality of life 1 year later ( n = 1172). Using frequencies, percentages, and odds ratios, we evaluated associations of unfiltered tap water consumption with perceived pet health (cross-sectional) and perceived pet health with general health and quality of life (cross-sectional and longitudinal). Daily unfiltered tap water drinkers were 3.12 (95% CI: 2.33–4.23) times more likely to report the FWC had made their pet ill compared to participants who never drank unfiltered water. Participants who reported Flint water made their pet ill had approximately a two-fold increase in odds of reporting poor/fair across all four health/quality-of-life measures compared to those who did not. Both animals and humans were exposed and impacted by the FWC. This study supports the interconnectedness between human and animal health, especially regarding environmental disaster exposure and outcomes.

Keywords: Flint water crisis; quality of life; pet health; environmental health; public health emergency; One Health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/250/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/250/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:250-:d:1588120

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().