Assessing Nicotine Exposure in Users and Non-Users of Electronic Cigarettes Through Silicone Wristbands

Giovanni E. Appolon (), Samantha Suess, Alice Xayavong, Nicolas Lopez Galvez, Nathan G. Dodder, Eunha Hoh, Penelope J. E. Quintana and Eyal Oren
Additional contact information
Giovanni E. Appolon: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Samantha Suess: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Alice Xayavong: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Nicolas Lopez Galvez: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Nathan G. Dodder: Research Foundation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Eunha Hoh: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Penelope J. E. Quintana: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Eyal Oren: School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 3, 1-14

Abstract: Although the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among youth has declined since its peak in 2018, it remains popular among young adults. Despite its popularity, research on the health effects of secondhand exposure to ENDS remains limited. Silicone wristbands offer a simple, cost-effective method for measuring nicotine exposure. The study employed a quasi-experimental design and recruited six dyads consisting of ENDS users and non-users. Over three consecutive months, all participants wore silicone wristbands for one week at a time to assess nicotine exposure. ENDS users had a higher overall median nicotine concentration in their silicone wristbands (423.2 ng/g, IQR: 199.2–669.1) compared to non-users (17.2 ng/g, IQR: 6.5–128.0). This trend was consistent across all time points. Statistically significant differences between ENDS users and non-users were observed during months 1 and 2 ( p -values = 0.0303 and 0.0411, respectively), but not during month 3 ( p -value = 0.2468). Similar trends were observed in urinary cotinine levels, with higher medians among ENDS users (1013.0 ng/mL, IQL: 442.0–1490.0) compared to non-users (1.3 ng/mL, IQL: 1.0–1.4). A significant correlation was found between urinary cotinine and wristband nicotine levels only in non-users (r = 0.69, p -value = 0.0017). Silicone wristbands worn by non-users can detect secondhand nicotine exposure and are significantly correlated with urinary cotinine.

Keywords: exposure assessment; particulate matter; silicone samplers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/388/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/388/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:388-:d:1607498

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().