EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Ability of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-5 to Identify Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder in the General Population

Benedicte Kirkøen (), Ragnhild Elise Ørstavik, Anne Reneflot, Jens Christoffer Skogen, Børge Sivertsen and Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen
Additional contact information
Benedicte Kirkøen: Department of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0473 Oslo, Norway
Ragnhild Elise Ørstavik: Department of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0473 Oslo, Norway
Anne Reneflot: Department of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0473 Oslo, Norway
Jens Christoffer Skogen: Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway
Børge Sivertsen: Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway
Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen: Department of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 5015 Bergen, Norway

IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 5, 1-14

Abstract: Background : The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) is a widely used measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. The short form HSCL-5 is especially suitable for large population-based studies, but its ability to detect mental disorders in the general population remains unknown. The aim of the study was to assess how well the HSCL-5 identified cases of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) measured by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 5.0 and to find the optimal sex-specific cut-off levels of the HSCL-5. Methods : Participants from the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) in Norway were recruited for the current study. Between April and September 2020, 1343 participants (64% women) aged 20–65 years completed the CIDI, followed by the HSCL-5. The overall agreement between the HSCL-5 and GAD or MDD measured by CIDI was examined with Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) for different cut-off levels were assessed. Results : The area under the curve for GAD or MDD was 0.90 (CI 95% = 0.85–0.95) for women and 0.85 (CI 95% = 0.68–1.00) for men. For women, a cut-off level of ≥1.80 had the best balance between sensitivity (85%) and specificity (84%), while the corresponding numbers were ≥2.00, 73%, and 93% for men. The global PPV was 21%, while the NPV was 99%. Conclusions : The HSCL-5 has high sensitivity and specificity for identifying cases of GAD or MDD. In the current study, the positive predictive value of HSCL-5 was low.

Keywords: Hopkins Symptom Checklist; Composite International Diagnostic Interview; anxiety; depression; validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/698/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/698/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:698-:d:1644837

Access Statistics for this article

IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu

More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-30
Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:698-:d:1644837