Brief Interventions for Families Seeking Support from Family Services: A Scoping Review
Victoria Hamilton (),
Gina-Maree Sartore,
Michelle Macvean,
Elbina Avdagic,
Zvezdana Petrovic,
Cathryn Hunter and
Catherine Wade
Additional contact information
Victoria Hamilton: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Gina-Maree Sartore: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Michelle Macvean: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Elbina Avdagic: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Zvezdana Petrovic: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Cathryn Hunter: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Catherine Wade: Parenting Research Centre, 696 Bourke Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
IJERPH, 2025, vol. 22, issue 6, 1-23
Abstract:
Brief family support interventions may be an effective and acceptable option when demands on services and pressures on families can often mean intensive, long-term family support interventions are an inefficient and unappealing course of action. The purpose of this scoping review was to better understand the nature of non-medical brief interventions targeted at parents and families experiencing adversity or challenging circumstances that may lead them to seek support from family services. We used a systematic search and selection process to identify publications (papers or webpages) about brief interventions for parents and families within three academic databases and 70 websites. Publications were in scope if the interventions were targeted to parents and families, were non-medical in nature, and were brief (no longer than 10 h duration, or up to four sessions). We identified 78 papers and webpages eligible for inclusion in this scoping review, covering 46 brief interventions. Data were extracted by two researchers and charted in a spreadsheet. Most interventions were delivered in the mental health sector, followed by the education, and then community or family services sector, and most often in a clinical setting. Intervention duration varied, ranging from 45 min to a two-day workshop, and were usually aimed at improving the mental health of children and young people. Interventions were delivered to groups of parents, followed by whole families or individual parents. This review highlights the pressing need for high-quality evaluations of brief interventions for family support, and given the diversity of delivery modes, durations and conceptualisation of ‘brief intervention’ in the field and literature, further synthesis of the evidence through systematic reviews is required. This paper advances understanding and clarity on how brief interventions may be beneficial for families experiencing adversity, yet further evaluation and systematic review for acceptability and efficacy is required.
Keywords: brief interventions; family services; vulnerable families; scoping review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I I1 I3 Q Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/841/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/841/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:841-:d:1665602
Access Statistics for this article
IJERPH is currently edited by Ms. Jenna Liu
More articles in IJERPH from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().